• Welcome to TREKS IN SCI-FI FORUM.
 

News:

The next podcast will be on Feb. 19th and will be a guest cast by Mark.

Main Menu

"STAR TREK Into Darkness" - 2013

Started by Rico, June 17, 2009, 04:46:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bryancd

Quote from: X on September 08, 2012, 05:27:40 AM
I get what you're saying, but I just mentally add it. Khan didn't have a colon on the posters either. It was added latter because we pause.

That's true but they had a very prominent II after Star Trek which made it read differently to me.

Jobydrone

Quote from: X on September 08, 2012, 05:27:40 AM
...Khan didn't have a colon on the posters either.
How does he poop?
"I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal."  -Groucho Marx

Dangelus

Quote from: Jobydrone on September 10, 2012, 10:39:38 AM
Quote from: X on September 08, 2012, 05:27:40 AM
...Khan didn't have a colon on the posters either.
How does he poop?

I'm honestly shocked we didn't get to the poop jokes a lot sooner! Lol

Well if the movie turns out to be a load of poop they may need to reinstate the colon ;)

Meds

I've read a few people moaning and whinging about the Title. Really? I mean I think its's a good sounding title.

Rico

Quote from: HawkeyeMeds on September 11, 2012, 03:40:02 PM
I've read a few people moaning and whinging about the Title. Really? I mean I think its's a good sounding title.

Always going to be people who will complain.  I think the title is pretty cool. 

ChrisMC

I think it does the job of telling us that this is new Trek. It's unlike the sequel names from all of the previous movies. It tells us we're in for danger and intrigue. For me it gets the job done...What would people prefer, Star Trek:Resurrection or some other hackneyed title?
Check out our Classic BSG podcast! http://ragtagfugitivepodcast.com/

KingIsaacLinksr

It doesn't bother me at all, at least this will be easier to talk about than saying Star Trek (2009) everytime. That never got old ;)

A Paladin Without A Crusade Blog... www.kingisaaclinksr.wordpress.com
My Review of Treks In Sci-Fi Podcast: http://wp.me/pQq2J-zs
Let's Play: Videogames YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/kingisaaclinksr

Ktrek

I'm glad they kept Star Trek in the title at least. I think it would have been a huge mistake to leave that out but Into Darkness is an intriguing title. Hopefully it will have several shades of meaning in the story.

Kevin
"Oh...Well, Who am I to argue with me?" Dr. Bashir - Visionary - Deep Space Nine

moyer777

I heard the plot is about Captain Kirk and the crew getting caught in the Willy Wonka universe.  The Enterprise is sucked into the suction tube in the river of chocolate, thus the name INTO DARKNESS.  Should be a tasty movie.

I have been and always will be, your friend.
Listen to our podcast each week http://www.takehimwithyou.com

Dangelus

Quote from: HawkeyeMeds on September 11, 2012, 03:40:02 PM
I've read a few people moaning and whinging about the Title. Really? I mean I think its's a good sounding title.

I like the different use and emphasis on the words. Perhaps some people are so frustrated with the lack of info they are looking for things to dislike?

Rico

JJ at working editing the film...


ChrisMC

Cut a trailer JJ! You got time to lean you got time to clean!:)
Check out our Classic BSG podcast! http://ragtagfugitivepodcast.com/

davekill


WillEagle


Bryancd