"Conan the Barbarian" - movie

Started by Rico, March 05, 2011, 12:07:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bryancd

Quote from: billybob476 on March 23, 2011, 08:24:25 AM
Interesting, the first movie was downright creepy and just plain odd.

It was very a much a product of the time it was made! Another good example of an "epic" tale movie that was wierd beyond belief was "Excalibur".

billybob476

Quote from: Bryancd on March 23, 2011, 08:56:10 AM
Quote from: billybob476 on March 23, 2011, 08:24:25 AM
Interesting, the first movie was downright creepy and just plain odd.

It was very a much a product of the time it was made! Another good example of an "epic" tale movie that was wierd beyond belief was "Excalibur".

Don't get me wrong, Conan is one of my guilty pleasures, I got Fran to watch it and she was less then impressed. Isn't Patrick Stewart in Excalibur?

Bryancd

Yep, he was, that and DUNE, another good example of wacky early '80 films!

jedijeff

I recently watched the Original, as I got the two movies on a DVD combo pack for really cheap. I keep thinking I have not seen it or just parts, but when I watched it recently, realized I have seen it in it's entirety before. I can't recall if I have seen the second movie completely, but that is in the queue for this weekend.

Looking forward to this new one, should be fun.

Vartok

Music by Basil Pouledoris - a not fully appreciated composer!  Listening to it now, ahh, pleasure.

V

Rico


Bryancd

Not even sure Real 3D, whatever that is can save this. My thing is I can't get beyond the guy playing Conan. As odd and campy as the original, Arnold left such an indelible impression, and an impressive one, of the character, this dude is no Conan.

Jobydrone

Quote from: Bryancd on May 05, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Not even sure Real 3D, whatever that is can save this. My thing is I can't get beyond the guy playing Conan. As odd and campy as the original, Arnold left such an indelible impression, and an impressive one, of the character, this dude is no Conan.

I am leaning towards this opinion.  For me, not having read the books or comics ever, Arnold as Conan is so indelibly burned into my mind as THE Conan, I can't imagine any other actor supplanting him.  For new generations of viewers though I'm glad to see another fantasy genre flick with the potential to become a franchise get some love.  For me, this reminds me too much of the recent Clash of the Titans remake:  unneccessary to supplant the greatness of the original.
"I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal."  -Groucho Marx

X

Quote from: Bryancd on May 05, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Not even sure Real 3D, whatever that is can save this. My thing is I can't get beyond the guy playing Conan. As odd and campy as the original, Arnold left such an indelible impression, and an impressive one, of the character, this dude is no Conan.
I see him on Game of Thrones and have the opposite reaction. My mind goes "Yeah ... he can be Conan". I'll also say that his acting skills are better going into the film than Arnold's were.

Bryancd

Quote from: X on May 06, 2011, 07:05:47 AM
I'll also say that his acting skills are better going into the film than Arnold's were.

No doubt, it was Arnold physical presence which is so memorable.

Jobydrone

Huh, which character is he on GoT?
"I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal."  -Groucho Marx

X

Quote from: Jobydrone4of20 on May 06, 2011, 07:00:17 AM
Quote from: Bryancd on May 05, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Not even sure Real 3D, whatever that is can save this. My thing is I can't get beyond the guy playing Conan. As odd and campy as the original, Arnold left such an indelible impression, and an impressive one, of the character, this dude is no Conan.

I am leaning towards this opinion.  For me, not having read the books or comics ever, Arnold as Conan is so indelibly burned into my mind as THE Conan, I can't imagine any other actor supplanting him.  For new generations of viewers though I'm glad to see another fantasy genre flick with the potential to become a franchise get some love.  For me, this reminds me too much of the recent Clash of the Titans remake:  unneccessary to supplant the greatness of the original.
Having seen both Clashes back to back now, I find myself preferring the newer one. I don't know why that is, but I also feel the same about the new Tron. Maybe I've found a way to divorce myself from the nostalgia and compare it on the other levels.

Hell, I'd love to see a remake of Krull and Dragonslayer too. I'd love to see how they could pull those off with the way cinematography and FX have changed.

X


Jobydrone

That makes sense Chris, I haven't seen the original Clash in a long time and probably my memory of it is kind of rosy compared to the reality of it.  Same with Conan.  I loved them both so much as a kid though.  Tron was a sequel remember, not a remake, that makes a big difference.
"I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal."  -Groucho Marx

Bryancd

..and the original TRON was a bit of a dud story and action wise.